I do own one, but with a shorter bed, and you are correct, it isn't an issue in terms of weight distribution alone.
I was commenting on the off-road handling and capabilities of a longer-bed pick up truck and the characteristics of driving a longer bed truck off-road (ICE or EV). Most trails are not straight, which means more difficulty with maneuverability off-road or over more technical terrain with a longer wheelbase. I imagine that due to pure physics alone, even with equal weight distribution, a longer wheel base (even if only 10" longer) would equal a rougher ride and more pogo'ing (regardless of weight distribution).
I have never been off-roading in a longer wheel base truck with a long bed. Most trucks perform better off-road with shorter wheelbases, generally speaking, since they do provide better maneuverability and can offer better traction without adding weight over the rear axles, and offer the ability to clear obstacles that require better ramp-over angles.
I think we're agreeing with each other. Yes, smaller vehicles are generally better off-road. That's my reason for posting in this thread.
The Terra is specced to have a 149 inch wheelbase, which is larger than the Lightning, though the Terra is supposed to be shorter overall than the Lightning (good for approach and/or departure angles). The Lighnting is fine for forest service / fire roads, but it's not an off-roader and it has nothing to do with the drivetrain; it's all about size and weight. The Terra's wheelbase is 46 inches longer than the wheelbase of the 1989 Toyota pickup with a 6-foot bed, just slightly less than 5 feet longer than the Toyota FJ40, and more than 5 feet longer than the CJ-5. Both Scouts are specced to be 80 inches wide, which is as wide as the Suzuki Samurai's wheelbase. The Traveler is 42 inches longer than the Scout II and has a 20 inch longer wheelbase. The Scouts as-specced are just massive and won't be true off-roaders. They'll be fantastic on paved and gravel roads, but--IMO--they'll be too large and awkward to be good or even any fun on truly off-road trails.
The following are some of the vehicles I've off-roaded (with a "*" and in colored text) and have considered (black text). Green indicates my opinion of the best off-roading vehicles, purple means adequate on most trails, and red means some really nice trails are inaccessible to the vehicle. I have also off-roaded in much smaller vehicles like a Chevy Chevette, and larger vehicles like a couple dozen different pickup trucks, Ford Expeditions, Chevy Suburbans, a RWD Chevrolet C-60 flatbed 2-ton truck, and a pile of others--4wd isn't always necessary to climb up a mountain or into a canyon. In general, small size makes for a better off-roader. I would take a Prius on some roads I wouldn't take the Lightning.
Looking at the numbers, I now think the Maverick is actually on the large size for an off-roader, similar to the Tacoma; I've never looked at its numbers before now, just observed it from afar.
I don't think either the Scout Traveler or Terra are appropriately-sized for the kind of off-roading I like to do, thus my earlier answer of "I hate large vehicles for off-roading."
Vehicle | Width (inches) | Wheelbase (inches) | Length (inches) |
---|---|---|---|
* 1974 Jeep CJ-5 | 72 | 84 | 139 |
* 1975 Toyota Landcruiser FJ40 | 66 | 90 | 151 |
* 1982 Suzuki Samurai | 61 | 80 | 135 |
* 1989 Toyota Pickup | 67 | 103 | 175 |
* 1989 Toyota 4-Runner | 67 | 103 | 175 |
* 1980 International Scout II | 66 | 100 | 166 |
* 2010 Jeep Wrangler 2-Door | 74 | 95 | 153 |
* 2012 Toyota Tundra DC | 80 | 146 | 229 |
* 2007 Tacoma TRD-OR, SB, DC | 75 | 128 | 208 |
* 2019 Tacoma TRD-OR, LB, DC | 75 | 141 | 226 |
* 2023 Ford Lightning | 80 | 146 | 233 |
2024 Ford Maverick | 78 | 121 | 200 |
2024 Toyota 4-Runner | 76 | 110 | 191 |
2024 Jeep Wrangler 2-Door | 74 | 97 | 167 |
2024 Jeep Wrangler 4-Door | 74 | 118 | 188 |
2024 Ford Bronco 4-Door | 86 | 117 | 191 |
2027 Scout Terra | 80 | 149 | 229 |
2027 Scout Traveler | 80 | 120 | 208 |