I reserved the Harvester.. let's hope the CAD dollar is better by thenSo I reserved the Traveler. Looking forward to build and price.
I reserved the Harvester.. let's hope the CAD dollar is better by thenSo I reserved the Traveler. Looking forward to build and price.
Exactly! On all three accounts!A few reasons it wonāt be 80k
-no āstealershipsā involved
-as batteries tech improves, cheaper manufacturing becomes. Thereās a battery that uses no mined materials that is said to be better than any battery seen before with faster charging and better life overall.
-hopefully by 2027 the market has gone back to pre-COVID levels.
I'm a Trailblazer girl. Mine is an '06, and I've taken really good care of her which is why it's still running well today. Haven't seen anything to replace it with until the Scout. Length is an issue, as it's 15" longer than my Trailblazer. Going to have to look at a garage upgrade.I have been a Tahoe guy for a long time and this is the first electric SUV that looks like it could be an actual replacement! Very Excited. 3" shorter than a Tahoe but same height and I am guessing same width with the mirrors out. (91.6" looks very wide considering a Hummer H1 is 85.6" wide)
I'm indecisive, so I reserved both the versions of the Traveler. I realize we can modify our reservation, but I wonder if it would restart your place in line if you changed a vehicle/option a year or two from now?
So this might be a bit too late, but the cabana top will be available on the Terra at release.I have a small farm and have been wanting an EV truck for a while. Ordered an f150 lightning but ended up not being able to purchase it due to other life events.
I don't have a connection to scout vehicles, but this is the vehicle that I have been looking for. 6+ seats, towing capacity, range, off-road abilities. My concern is that it's going to have to have a massive (heavy) battery to achieve the range.
I am back and forth between the Terra and the Traveler. The pickup format is useful, however my wife really loves that 'cabana' roof on the Traveler.
Tesla owner here. Second car is a 625 mile per fill VW V6 TDI Touareg.I wonder how many Harvester people have no EV experience, and how many do have EV experience and just want some added buffer and wouldn't mind having a secondary sub-system in their trucks?
In other words, if you already have an EV truck or car, are you in the minority (like me) ordering the pure EV because you know 350 miles of range is great and you would happily take it? Theory being that we have a ton of potential converts coming in for the Scout that want that "extra peace of mind" that the Harvester was (no doubt) designed to deliver? If so, that is great stuff for the new EV people if that 500 mile mark makes them more comfortable. Either way, I give props to Scout for rallying (see what I did there) those on the fence.
Having just under 300 miles of range in my R1T on 20's and AT's is pretty great, but grabbing ~60 or so more miles on AT's would be even better. Based on my current usage and road trips, I would rarely be able to take advantage of the Harvester. BUT, I also realize that I have this understanding (and comfort) because I have 40K miles on my truck, and would prefer the simplicity of 350 miles range from a pure EV...
We're all electric with a '22 Mustang (312 miles EPA range) and '23 Lightning (320 miles EPA range) with 50,000 miles total, mostly road tripping around the southwest US. I won't go back to gas. There's nothing about it that appeals to me. I don't even rent gas vehicles on work trips anymore. Reserved a Traveler EV.I wonder how many Harvester people have no EV experience, and how many do have EV experience and just want some added buffer and wouldn't mind having a secondary sub-system in their trucks?
In other words, if you already have an EV truck or car, are you in the minority (like me) ordering the pure EV because you know 350 miles of range is great and you would happily take it? Theory being that we have a ton of potential converts coming in for the Scout that want that "extra peace of mind" that the Harvester was (no doubt) designed to deliver? If so, that is great stuff for the new EV people if that 500 mile mark makes them more comfortable. Either way, I give props to Scout for rallying (see what I did there) those on the fence.
Having just under 300 miles of range in my R1T on 20's and AT's is pretty great, but grabbing ~60 or so more miles on AT's would be even better. Based on my current usage and road trips, I would rarely be able to take advantage of the Harvester. BUT, I also realize that I have this understanding (and comfort) because I have 40K miles on my truck, and would prefer the simplicity of 350 miles range from a pure EV...
No doubt about the many variables that will come into play with the range equation for the pure BEV - including wheels and tires. With my AT's Rivian states a 10-15% range reduction on my R1T. I also run Nokian Hakka LT3's in the winter (different tread) but run in colder temps and see about the same reduction on the LT3. With the Scout being designed (and shown) as a more rugged & off-road oriented truck, and with 800V architecture, and with what will hopefully be a very good-sized battery and BMS, who knows where we might actually end up in a couple of years in terms of range figures with AT's. Everything is getting better, lighter, faster and more efficient, so my hope is that range figures do come close to a 350 number as you see the Terra spec's today. It is completely achievable. Once you start customizations (add a winch, add a rack, add a RTT, lift the truck, add chunkier tires and reduce wheel sizes, etc. you are on your own in terms of range). The current proportions based on the Terra reveal look great, so I wouldn't want to stray too far from what was shown to maximize efficiency. Performance will be very good in that configuration.I think you may need to dial back some expectations. They said up to 350 mi EV and they showed a truck with 35s. They didnāt say a truck with 35s will get 350 miles. I would bet that a base version with like 32ā tires will get 350mi and an off-road package with 35s will get significantly less than that. Thatās a big brick to push through the air.
Is the 150 mile estimate confirmed by someone from Scout? That is really low with the Harvester (which I reserved). It would be fine for commuting to work I guess, but the EV savings wouldn't really be there on trips. I am wondering if there will be a larger battery option to go along with the Harvester especially for people who are interested in towing.Tesla owner here. Second car is a 625 mile per fill VW V6 TDI Touareg.
150 miles battery only is too little. 350 (or 297 actual, LOL) is fine. Harvester will be constantly running with such a low battery only range. For people who drive hybrids, this may feel acceptable. As a happy BEV driver, it doesnāt make me happy.
My fantasy for Traveler is that, by the time they are in production, we see battery range increase to 225 on Harvester version, and 400 on non-Harvester version.
Iāll definitely punch out of Harvester if they can break 400 on battery only version. The 150 thing is making me feel like Iām buying a Prius.