EveryoneWhoa, who’s that directed at?
EveryoneWhoa, who’s that directed at?
I’m with you in the hopeful camp!Lets stay hopeful with the pricing they gave. Dont be a debby downer.
The guy you voted for got elected because people were mad about high prices. I’m mad about what I see are needlessly high prices that make something that was a utilitarian vehicle meant for anyone and everyone become something that is only available to the elite. You know, the people that weren’t paying attention to the people who couldn’t afford stuff.Everyone
I imagine thats at the "royal everyone" so to speak.Whoa, who’s that directed at?
I agree with you to some extent. And low prices are what everyone wants.The guy you voted for got elected because people were mad about high prices. I’m mad about what I see are needlessly high prices that make something that was a utilitarian vehicle meant for anyone and everyone become something that is only available to the elite. You know, the people that weren’t paying attention to the people who couldn’t afford stuff.
I don’t believe that this is a political statement, but it is definitely subjective. I’m not going to keep testing the forum’s patience because I like posting here.
The guy you voted for got elected because people were mad about high prices. I’m mad about what I see are needlessly high prices that make something that was a utilitarian vehicle meant for anyone and everyone become something that is only available to the elite. You know, the people that weren’t paying attention to the people who couldn’t afford stuff.
That’s a bit political for the forum.Being mad about high prices, and voting for the guy who wants to put 10-20% tariff on everything, is kind of self defeating...
I agree. Though I did laughThat’s a bit political for the forum.
Thanks. I appreciate you saying this. What got under my goat was “debbie downer:” it makes my skin crawl to read it or hear it.I agree with you to some extent. And low prices are what everyone wants.
in terms of "Launch" for the new Scout, and in terms of tooling for the new factory and optimally building the first tranche of new Scouts, I would not envision all kinds of optionality out of the gate, but this is just a guess. Also, and from a slightly different perspective in terms of perceived brand value and bringing the Scout logo back to consumers, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that Scout will likely want to make its re-birth or reemergence into the truck market with something that looks a lot like what was revealed (and doesn't look like a "bronco sport" version of the truck). I would envision them rolling out the initial slug of trucks like Rivian did it with the R1T and R1S as "launch edition" or "first edition" type vehicles (then the subsequent launch of other lower priced trim levels). If you don't want that initial version of the Scout, perhaps you just retain your place in the build line for whatever they option-out next at assembly.
This is all speculation, and maybe it sounds controversial, but if this is the case, the initial set of new Scout buyers might benefit from nicely equipped trucks at a justifiable & fair price-point (based on options & what the first models will include). This will of course irk some buyers hoping to see a more bare-boned truck or a model that is equipped differently straight out of the gate at a lower price point. But it is important for Scout to think about perception and initial response from the market, as well as easier servicing for trucks that roll off the line and have similar configurations. You know what they say about 1st impressions.
unfortunately, those are not the base models they showed. they recently actually said those are "concept models". which basically means they haven't locked down the trims/specs but those were more "loaded" versions.What would be funny is of that was the base models they showed at the reveal.
Thats what I'm hoping for!!
yeah, thats right wrt Rivian. they set a price point in 2018/2019 and Covid hit and their supply chain went out the door. with that went their costs. they had to jack up the price but customers revolted and they rolled it back for early reservation holders. they sold every vehicle at a loss due to that as well as because they were ramping up production so lots of cap ex. they are still trying to make a profit per vehicle sold. costs are moving down with each quarter but its been a struggle and i feel bad for them with such unlucky timing.To clarify.
Are you postulating that the "Launch Edition" would be offered at a relatively high trim level, but at potentially artificially low price points, to drive home the perceived value for the initial reservation holders?
I only ask because, yes, that sort of happened for Rivians (AFAIK). But I didn't think that was much of a "planned event", as it was "they had reservations at X price, and then had to finish building/delivering the number promised at that price before they can adjust prices upward due to inflation".
Am I remembering that incorrectly?
I mean, I'd love more value for being an early reservation holder/forum member/whatever other reason. I'm just not sure how likely that is, and if Rivian actively did it like that, or if its just how it ended up due to the Covid supply chain/price increase sort of stuff happening at the same time.
The annual rate of inflation is currently at 2.6% (measured over the past 12 months Oct - Oct).Do you think Scout’s prices are in today’s dollars or assuming 10% higher from 3-5 years of inflation?
The base models probably have 32 in tires, spare underneath, no tire carrier, cloth seats, no Harvester, metal roof, no wood in the interior.unfortunately, those are not the base models they showed. they recently actually said those are "concept models". which basically means they haven't locked down the trims/specs but those were more "loaded" versions.
It was implied at reveal that 32’s/33’s would be standard and spare would be under vehicle. Was implied spare carrier was an option. Knowing a metal roof is available it only makes sense that metal will be standard. No word on searing but if seats are cloth it won’t be cloth as we are used to but some form of recycled material. The designers all said they are fighting to have the seats as shown in concepts so it may show up in a mid level-maybe in faux leather then a top tier with real leather.The base models probably have 32 in tires, spare underneath, no tire carrier, cloth seats, no Harvester, metal roof, no wood in the interior.
What else?