Range and Competitiveness

  • From all of us at Scout Motors, welcome to the Scout Community! We created this community to provide Scout vehicle owners, enthusiasts, and curiosity seekers with a place to engage in discussion, suggestions, stories, and connections. Supportive communities are sometimes hard to find, but we're determined to turn this into one.

    Additionally, Scout Motors wants to hear your feedback and speak directly to the rabid community of owners as unique as America. We'll use the Scout Community to deliver news and information on events and launch updates directly to the group. Although the start of production is anticipated in 2026, many new developments and milestones will occur in the interim. We plan to share them with you on this site and look for your feedback and suggestions.

    How will the Scout Community be run? Think of it this way: this place is your favorite local hangout. We want you to enjoy the atmosphere, talk to people who share similar interests, request and receive advice, and generally have an enjoyable time. The Scout Community should be a highlight of your day. We want you to tell stories, share photos, spread your knowledge, and tell us how Scout can deliver great products and experiences. Along the way, Scout Motors will share our journey to production with you.

    Scout is all about respect. We respect our heritage. We respect the land and outdoors. We respect each other. Every person should feel safe, included, and welcomed in the Scout Community. Being kind and courteous to the other forum members is non-negotiable. Friendly debates are welcomed and often produce great outcomes, but we don't want things to get too rowdy. Please take a moment to consider what you post, especially if you think it may insult others. We'll do our best to encourage friendly discourse and to keep the discussions flowing.

    So, welcome to the Scout Community! We encourage you to check back regularly as we plan to engage our members, share teasers, and participate in discussions. The world needs Scouts™. Let's get going.


    We are Scout Motors.
From what I can tell

Jeep Wrangler 4XE has a 17.3KWH pack, with a 15KWh usable capacity. That's about 86%. usage.

Volt Gen2 has a 18.4 kWh pack , with 14 kWh usable. That's about 76%.

So Chevy held it to a lower SOC, which can dramatically increase lifespan.

Jeep is pushing it too close IMO, plus the short EV range means the average driver can use ALL that capacity every day.
I think you are 100% correct. They are trying to maximize EV only range at the expense of battery degradation. Scout will have to make similar decisions, but I hope the larger battery will see less degradation
 
I think you are 100% correct. They are trying to maximize EV only range at the expense of battery degradation. Scout will have to make similar decisions, but I hope the larger battery will see less degradation

With such a large battery for a PHEV/EREV, I doubt Scout will need to hold much reserve.

A decent rule of thumb starting point for pack life is Range x 1000.

For a 22 mile range Wrangler 4XE that's 22000 miles.

For a 150 mile range Scout Harvester that's 150000 miles.

Note that these are EV only miles.

Also I think there is a chance the Scout will use LFP batteries in the Harvester, which essentially doubles those numbers.
 
The more charge cycles you put on any rechargeable battery, the shorter the life span. Sure, level 2 charging vs DC fast charging isn't going to be as big of a hit, but that repetitive strain will add up over time. Another part is I also don't want to have to charge every night in that hypothetical situation. Even with my old Corolla, I tried to maximize my mileage so I could avoid getting gas as much as possible, specially with how expensive it was getting.

A big thing for me in general too is I'd rather have better range that features such as 34" tires/wheels for offroading. I know it's an incredible hot take for many who are looking forward to these vehicles, but the fact that the truck in particular is potentially going to be out of the gate at 350 miles of range at $60,000~ is enough to make me look past some of the features that I feel like should be options, rather than standard.

I can say from experience with buffers for range, they're great to have, but a 10 mile buffer can drop to a 2 mile buffer with the "right" conditions and leave you crawling to the charger due to a sudden temperature drop.

However,

LiFePO4 (Lithium Iron Phosphate) batteries like to be charged to 100% often and have a charge cycle lifetime at least 4 times longer than Lithium Ion Batteries. However, current energy density of LiFePO4 is less than Lithium Ion, but LiFePO4 weighs less.

Then there is Solid State, which hasn't been incorporated into any EV/EREV or PHEV that I'm aware of to date.

from that internet thing:

Lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) batteries have a longer life cycle than lithium-ion batteries. LiFePO4 batteries can last for over 10 years, while lithium-ion batteries typically last 2–5 years.

The LiFePO4 battery has the edge over lithium-ion, both in terms of cycle life (it lasts 4-5x longer), and safety. This is a key advantage because lithium-ion batteries can overheat and even catch fire, while LiFePO4 does not.

So I just don't know what Scout is planning by 2028 (but I hope it's 2027 or 2026).

Cheers

L
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sockdoc and bb00799
Thank you for your input! While the average daily commute for many US citizens might be 40 miles, there are plenty of us who regularly drive much more. My comment about a 200-mile range EREV reflects my personal needs, not an attempt to downplay other configurations.

Having owned a Tesla in the past, I found the need to limit charging to 80% for battery health, combined with a real-world range often being less than advertised, made pure EVs less practical for me. An EREV with a higher electric range, like 150-200 miles, would better suit drivers who travel 80-100+ miles daily while offering flexibility for longer trips. It’s great to discuss different needs—thanks for the conversation!
but in fairness. you have two choices with Scout

1. Buy the BEV - 350 mile range. should cover your 200 mile round trip without charging, even in cold weather, but you'd want a good charger at home (probably one of the 48A ones). You'll need to charge each day. If you had charging at work, it would be even easier, but even if you don't, and just charge once you get home, you should be fine.

2. Buy the EREV
2a. Charge only at home. Leave home, drive all the way to work, drive home, use the harvester for about 50 miles of the trip automatically (call it 1.5 gallons? Charge at night
2b. Charge at work and home. Leave home, drive to work, charge while at work, drive home, plug in. Uses only electric and has plenty of range. if you ever forget or there's a problem chargine one day, it won't matter, the harvester will kick on for the last little bit and get your home with no issue.

We are moving to a city about 250 miles away from where we live now. I expect that I'll get the Harvester only because the 350 mile range, in winter, would put me too close for comfort going over the passes/etc. In the summer, it'd be totally fine, but I would have to charge before heading home, or stop and charge for 15 minutes going one way or the other.

In all honesty, I could make the BEV work well for me, but I am getting the Harvester because
1. I'll still drive 90%+ of my miles on electric, cheaply and smoothly.
2. I'll have unlimited range when we do make a road trip, without finding a charger
3. In the event of power outage or camping or tailgating, I think it will be awesome to have the AC power to power our home.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Latrant and Sockdoc
This conversation has me wondering how many Harvester reservations will convert to regular BEV when it comes time to actually place orders.
We really don’t know what we are getting with our current reservations…time will tell but I like how they are not locking anyone in to one configuration or another.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Latrant