Ditto!Pretty please with sugar on top, I am offering consumer feedback that while it is a neat feature, it is suboptimal for an urban street parking situation and for seeing out the rear window. Do not want.
Ditto!Pretty please with sugar on top, I am offering consumer feedback that while it is a neat feature, it is suboptimal for an urban street parking situation and for seeing out the rear window. Do not want.
I heard 37’s twice at event but NO idea where you store those as a spare.
If the Terra with 35’s and the Harvester requires a bed mount, it should have had a bed mounted spare for the reveal, but it didn’t.It appears the tire carrier is going to depend on tire size and other options like Harvester.
35’s were shown on the reveal vehicles (this size will apparently require the tire carrier).
32’s will be apparently be available from the factory (and will fit under the vehicle, but perhaps only if it does not have the Harvester generator)
Scott said during the reveal that the vehicle can potentially go bigger than 35’s.
Someone at the event was told 37’s are expected to be offered (I think I heard that on the Real Mum Car Tours Youtube video). If so, they’d need a bigger tire carrier.
Completely agreed on all counts. I reserved with Harvester and having the option for under or inside spare storage for typical weekly use would be better than the rear carrier on all the time.I’ll also maintain/say again (for visibility to scout) that I think the Traveler should have 3 options for tire location.
1) under body storage of sizes 33in and smaller (ideally on all models, but understandably potentially not possible on the traveler harvester)
2) optional/removeable external tire carrier. Removeable because might not fit in garages, and is kind of a pain for day to day life.
3) in the rear storage area like the Jeep ZJ (sorry, 1993-1998 grand Cherokee). Uses up storage space but reduces OAL by 17in.
Personally I Would likely use optional external carrier for long road trips, and internal around down when I need less storage. Although under body is preferred if possible of course.
While options are great for customers Scout also needs to keep costs down as a “new” company. This means keeping parts and manufacturing simpler imo.If the Terra with 35’s and the Harvester requires a bed mount, it should have had a bed mounted spare for the reveal, but it didn’t.
Just pointing that out, to show that even what we saw at the reveal might not be perfectly consistent with what we get in the future.
I’ll also maintain/say again (for visibility to scout) that I think the Traveler should have 3 options for tire location.
1) under body storage of sizes 33in and smaller (ideally on all models, but understandably potentially not possible on the traveler harvester)
2) optional/removeable external tire carrier. Removeable because might not fit in garages, and is kind of a pain for day to day life.
3) in the rear storage area like the Jeep ZJ (sorry, 1993-1998 grand Cherokee). Uses up storage space but reduces OAL by 17in.
Personally I Would likely use optional external carrier for long road trips, and internal around down when I need less storage. Although under body is preferred if possible of course.
That's a fair point.On the bright side, you may not need to open the back as often as you think since there is a fairly spacious looking frunk up front.
Why can’t the spare tire be placed into the frunk?? Seems like a simple solution.@Jamie@ScoutMotors will the spare tire carrier be easily removable? Overall length is pushing it for my garage, but without it, it would definitely fit. I'd store it until I needed it.
Probably wouldn't fit, even w/o offroad tires the diameters of these wheels is looking to be pretty large.Why can’t the spare tire be placed into the frunk?? Seems like a simple solution.
7’ is standard garage door height. Especially with new home builders. So glad I chose 8’ when we built our current house because with a rack on top that’s gonna be a TIGHT fitOnly way I can see a removable rear spare tire carrier is if it’s a hitch mounted option or a bumper/hitch combo. It’s a big/bulky and heavy thing and that’s before you put a spare tire on
We had a 92 full sized Bronco with the swing out spare tire and it never got in the way or was hard to open at the grocery store & when traveling
It all boils down to how spoiled we are as a people & how accustomed to living in a world where your back hatch senses your approach & automatically opens
What is the average height of a garage door, ours is all of 7’ and the Traveller is to tall to fit…
I just want to point out the sacrifice I made for this forum. I Google searched hitch mounted spare tire carriers then eventually visited the above manufacturer's website a few times to find the above pic for my post. Thanks to that I'm now getting constant ads from these guys about their off-roading gear. *I do not own an off-roader.* It's been crazy this last week, if it wasn't political ads it was stuff from these guys. Absolutely crazy. /rantHoping the tire carrier is optional. On a daily driver that's not constantly going into the wilderness I could see it being cumbersome having to swing open a heavy wheel/rack every time you want to use the trunk in addition to reduced visibility and garage restrictions.
That said I could see hitch mounted tire carriers as a solid middle ground and a nice addition to the accessories catalog. Achieves same result w/swing out option and the beauty is you can detach/store it when not needed.
Example:
View attachment 3575
The rear carrier is not in the airflow, so really won't affect aerodynamics.
There is truth to that but let’s be honest. It’s a box on wheels. This isn’t a vehicle designed in a wind tunnel to improve slip stream. It’s a box on wheels with a big surface causing resistance. I think the little bit of extra drag is insignificant in the big picture. The ability to mount under vehicle is still a valid option as well for those that are truly concerned about maximum rangeAs far as I recall, anything behind the vehicle will affect drag, therefore it all matters.
As far as I recall, anything behind the vehicle will affect drag, therefore it all matters.