Extra, Extra....Read All About It!

  • From all of us at Scout Motors, welcome to the Scout Community! We created this community to provide Scout vehicle owners, enthusiasts, and curiosity seekers with a place to engage in discussion, suggestions, stories, and connections. Supportive communities are sometimes hard to find, but we're determined to turn this into one.

    Additionally, Scout Motors wants to hear your feedback and speak directly to the rabid community of owners as unique as America. We'll use the Scout Community to deliver news and information on events and launch updates directly to the group. Although the start of production is anticipated in 2026, many new developments and milestones will occur in the interim. We plan to share them with you on this site and look for your feedback and suggestions.

    How will the Scout Community be run? Think of it this way: this place is your favorite local hangout. We want you to enjoy the atmosphere, talk to people who share similar interests, request and receive advice, and generally have an enjoyable time. The Scout Community should be a highlight of your day. We want you to tell stories, share photos, spread your knowledge, and tell us how Scout can deliver great products and experiences. Along the way, Scout Motors will share our journey to production with you.

    Scout is all about respect. We respect our heritage. We respect the land and outdoors. We respect each other. Every person should feel safe, included, and welcomed in the Scout Community. Being kind and courteous to the other forum members is non-negotiable. Friendly debates are welcomed and often produce great outcomes, but we don't want things to get too rowdy. Please take a moment to consider what you post, especially if you think it may insult others. We'll do our best to encourage friendly discourse and to keep the discussions flowing.

    So, welcome to the Scout Community! We encourage you to check back regularly as we plan to engage our members, share teasers, and participate in discussions. The world needs Scouts™. Let's get going.


    We are Scout Motors.
May be difficult to charge an EV w/o the infrastructure. Lol

Potentially, another reason to purchase an EREV…:
They are probably trying to lower the amount of money given. There’s absolutely no reason why we are dedicating 5 billion dollars to it while the EU is only dedicating 1.5 billion dollars. The US Government never fails to Amaze me Money Wise. It’s like Oprah but to federal agencies, “You get Billions and You get Billions”. Yes is the US bigger than the EU yes, but still if they’re tackling it with less money then we can too. Thats why DOGE was created to remove the excess spending.
 
They are probably trying to lower the amount of money given. There’s absolutely no reason why we are dedicating 5 billion dollars to it while the EU is only dedicating 1.5 billion dollars. The US Government never fails to Amaze me Money Wise. It’s like Oprah but to federal agencies, “You get Billions and You get Billions”. Yes is the US bigger than the EU yes, but still if they’re tackling it with less money then we can too. Thats why DOGE was created to remove the excess spending.
I will agree to some level but I’m thinking the U.S. population is larger as a whole and the bigger issue is the way the U.S. lives vs most of Europe. European towns and cities are built to contain everything you need all within a few miles of the town center versus the U.S. which is MUCH more sprawling so rather than a couple miles it can be 10-30 miles.
Think of the argument on the thread about commuting-apparently people in the U.S. can commute up to 75 miles each way for work where I’m guessing most Europeans are within a mile or two and based on living in Italy for a summer (in 1995) most people hopped on a train or walked a mile or so. That was Rome which is VERY urban but point is people live very close to where they work in Europe vs long distances here. That then means more/larger charging stations so the quantity of stations is considerably more in the U.S. so I’m not saying it needs to be 5 billion but may need to be more like 2.5-3million ???
 
I will agree to some level but I’m thinking the U.S. population is larger as a whole and the bigger issue is the way the U.S. lives vs most of Europe. European towns and cities are built to contain everything you need all within a few miles of the town center versus the U.S. which is MUCH more sprawling so rather than a couple miles it can be 10-30 miles.
Think of the argument on the thread about commuting-apparently people in the U.S. can commute up to 75 miles each way for work where I’m guessing most Europeans are within a mile or two and based on living in Italy for a summer (in 1995) most people hopped on a train or walked a mile or so. That was Rome which is VERY urban but point is people live very close to where they work in Europe vs long distances here. That then means more/larger charging stations so the quantity of stations is considerably more in the U.S. so I’m not saying it needs to be 5 billion but may need to be more like 2.5-3million ???
All valid points and it was an educational seminar. Is this 2/10 or 3/10? Im keeping track, if you make it everyone will throw a party outside of the redbrick house. If @Jamie@ScoutMotors can get us approval?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: J Alynn
Adding on to this: DOT is to REVISE the NEVI program, comments to be made in spring.

Certain aspects of revision could end up being quite positive. For example, the South Carolina NEVI plan mentions build out of DC fast chargers that max out at 150KW. When building for the future, using federal funding, why aim so ludicrously low, given what is currently possible? If a revised federal mandate were to set more reasonable minimum charging power targets, they few-months delay could end up improving the effort substantially.

Admittedly, it could certainly veer towards quite a different outcome. :)
 

Scout Team and @Jamie@ScoutMotors y’all have some explaining to do. I want a Scout not Rivian. Dabbing up Rivian engineers in the booth, giving a Scout Harvester test mule to Rivian. Rivian possibly creating a Harvester type package for them self’s. Sounds pretty Sketchy.

I would hope it’s for Rivian to build Scout a Zonal Platform and not that Rivian will become a Competitor.

And Obviously Scout isn’t Rivian nor VW, It’s Scout. So Separate yourself, this will only make Court harder.
 
Last edited:
VW invested $5.8 billion with Rivian. I don't think they're getting a divorce anytime soon.

Did you hear about the Rivian that got carried about 100ft by the floods caused by Hurricane Helene? Guy got in and drove it away.

The R1T is a decent offroad vehicle stock.

If the Scout can skip all the trial and error Rivian went through, improve the offroad capability, avoid stuff like frame welds breaking on the first year release of the Jeep Gladiator, etc., I'm okay with Rivian and Scout Motors cuddling as long as the offspring doesn't look like a Rivian. Sorry, but that's a face only a mother can love.
I don’t care as long as it’s for Scouts R&D for quality and Architecture for the Harvester and that stuff. But we don’t need Rivian to be like ha gotcha b**tch in a year and releases a EREV. Like I Hope Scout Bolded that in Documents that Rivian is Scout’s b**tch. Excuse all the language but it was needed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GHenle and J Alynn
No problem and understandable. Here's what I can find.

In short, Rivian is bleeding cash and needs VW more than VW needs Rivian. VW gets access to Rivian's electronic architecture. Rivian gets large scale vehicle manufacturing knowledge. Both will reduce manufacturing costs.

Well as long as its for R&D development I’m okay with it. But it’s still wack, that would be like Mercedes giving Vehicle to BMW to test. Just doesn’t make sense and would be worry some.

But it’s cool to know that Scouts are being tested out in the world.

Best thing for ScoutMotors to do is to tell the youtubers to calm down on how they talk about the company. It could really impact reservations. Because people are gonna be like well Scout and Rivian are the same but Rivian is out already better get that then wait for the Scout.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GHenle and J Alynn
A thread to drop news articles into.
Sony teases first of-its-kind EV collaboration packed with high-tech features: 'Revolutionize the travel experience'

Perhaps the most notable attribute is the sedan's self-driving technology. The Afeela is equipped with "a total of 40 sensors, including 18 cameras, 1 LIDAR array, nine radar sets and 12 ultrasonic sensors," according to InsideEVs.

The Afeela 1 starts at $102,000, making it one of the most expensive EVs out there. A cheaper version will be released a year later, priced at $86,000

 
  • Like
Reactions: THil08
Sony teases first of-its-kind EV collaboration packed with high-tech features: 'Revolutionize the travel experience'

Perhaps the most notable attribute is the sedan's self-driving technology. The Afeela is equipped with "a total of 40 sensors, including 18 cameras, 1 LIDAR array, nine radar sets and 12 ultrasonic sensors," according to InsideEVs.

The Afeela 1 starts at $102,000, making it one of the most expensive EVs out there. A cheaper version will be released a year later, priced at $86,000

FSD v1000.5 lol thats a crap ton of equipment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eddiet1212
How does the torque balance work in this engine to cancel vibration?

It's not inherently well balanced, it uses both crankshaft counter weights, and balance shafts to tame it.

It's also a scotch yoke, which no one else is selling. They are notorious for sliding friction and wear in the yoke.

Consider it a very experimental engine. If it were available, I would let other people be the beta testers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: THil08 and J Alynn
A thread to drop news articles into.

The Chevy Blazer EV SS is the first electric Daytona 500 pace car, and it looks ready to race​

1739218630956.jpeg


 
A thread to drop news articles into.
Automakers urge USDOT to quickly restart federal EV charging program

WASHINGTON, Feb 7 (Reuters) - A group representing automakers and electric vehicle charging companies on Friday urged the U.S. Transportation Department to quickly restart a $5 billion government EV infrastructure program.

On Thursday, the Trump administration said it was suspending the electric vehicle charging program and rescinding approval of state EV charging plans pending a new review.

The Electric Drive Transportation Association, whose members include General Motors (GM.N), opens new tab, Toyota (7203.T), opens new tab, BorgWarner (BWA.N), opens new tab, EVGo (EVGO.O), opens new tab, Stellantis (STLAM.MI), opens new tab, Walmart (WMT.N), opens new tab and others, said it urged the Trump administration "to quickly resume the critical work of the program and minimize uncertainty for states and their businesses, who have invested in infrastructure to serve local and national goals for advanced transportation."