VW is investing in Rivian

  • From all of us at Scout Motors, welcome to the Scout Community! We created this community to provide Scout vehicle owners, enthusiasts, and curiosity seekers with a place to engage in discussion, suggestions, stories, and connections. Supportive communities are sometimes hard to find, but we're determined to turn this into one.

    Additionally, Scout Motors wants to hear your feedback and speak directly to the rabid community of owners as unique as America. We'll use the Scout Community to deliver news and information on events and launch updates directly to the group. Although the start of production is anticipated in 2026, many new developments and milestones will occur in the interim. We plan to share them with you on this site and look for your feedback and suggestions.

    How will the Scout Community be run? Think of it this way: this place is your favorite local hangout. We want you to enjoy the atmosphere, talk to people who share similar interests, request and receive advice, and generally have an enjoyable time. The Scout Community should be a highlight of your day. We want you to tell stories, share photos, spread your knowledge, and tell us how Scout can deliver great products and experiences. Along the way, Scout Motors will share our journey to production with you.

    Scout is all about respect. We respect our heritage. We respect the land and outdoors. We respect each other. Every person should feel safe, included, and welcomed in the Scout Community. Being kind and courteous to the other forum members is non-negotiable. Friendly debates are welcomed and often produce great outcomes, but we don't want things to get too rowdy. Please take a moment to consider what you post, especially if you think it may insult others. We'll do our best to encourage friendly discourse and to keep the discussions flowing.

    So, welcome to the Scout Community! We encourage you to check back regularly as we plan to engage our members, share teasers, and participate in discussions. The world needs Scouts™. Let's get going.


    We are Scout Motors.
If this is all about in-car software it is a big mistake!

Rivian’s user experience is not as bad as some of the other’s but it’s still not great and the owners I hear just keep hoping future updates will improve things.

Meanwhile VW’s in-car entertainment software is apparently built on kubernetes which is a terrible technology stack that basically runs apps inside an app. Then Scout hired as its CTO the guy that oversaw some universally panned in-car tech user experience at Fisker. This gives me very low confidence that Scout will deliver a great tech experience.

All I want is physical buttons for all the cars essential functions and full support for Carplay (and Android Auto) including the new Carplay’s customizable instrument clusters. Supporting the Carplay platform makes it possible for individuals and small teams to create apps that run in the car with very little work. This expands customer choice in apps and services and allows the customer to benefit from future innovation. Locking down the experience to Scouts services and service partners would be a very, very bad idea.

The vehicle’s default built-in entertainment systems should be very, very basic, offering bluetooth connectivity etc. Scout should put zero work into bespoke integration of third party services from Spotify, Apple Music, Google Maps etc. Just leave all that to CarPlay and Android Auto where there are already hundreds of apps. There should probably be one built-in mapping system that would obviously have to be free like it is on phones.

Scout should probably make some CarPlay and Android Auto apps themselves. For example, an AM/FM radio is very useful for emergencies and venturing off grid. There should be a Scout CarPlay App that controls the vehicles radio that sits alongside all the other in-car entertainment apps that the users has installed on their phone.

The in-car software should not be very hard. Just keep it simple and take advantage of all the work Apple, Google and hundreds of developers for their platforms have already done. Rivian are going in the wrong direction when it comes to in-car software, shunning CarPlay entirely and building high cost bespoke systems that have high maintenance, high technical debt and high security burden.
I own a Tesla Y and an R1T. My biggest gripe is the lack of physical buttons. Frankly it can be dangerous with the amount of concentration required just to adjust the freakn’ air vents. My second biggest gripe is the lack of Apple/Android CarPlay. My wife’s car has it and I love it. Other than that, I do like the Rivian user experience when compared to the Tesla. There are a couple of features I’m waiting on (phone contacts, calendar) but overall I think the Rivian’s layout is simpler and more user friendly. All of this to say that I agree that Scout should keep it relatively simple with the in-car software. Save development $$, use CarPlay, and give me some physically adjustable air vents!
 
The SUV and pickup truck market segments are the largest in this country. There is room for multiple competitors. I'd also propose that Rivian competes in a different price segment with product that is different in many ways from what we are working on. Yes, we are both making SUVs and pickup trucks (lots of companies are) and they can all travel off-road, but there are many different ways to do that, support that and package it. Plus ours will have a history and heritage that comes through in both the design and the product itself. Rugged. Capable. Multitool. Plus it looks good. :D
When can we see it??
 
I am constantly amazed at how well Rivian did with its first ever production trucks. The SW is great and continues to improve over time with new releases. I'm not sure I've ever owned anything material that actually improved over time, but I feel like that is the case with this truck. I'm excited to see where this goes, and will reserve speculation on the VWAG $$$. One thing I don;t have is Apple Carplay anymore, but I run WAZE in the background on my phone when I'm driving, and I make calls simply by saying "Hey Siri" using the Rivian Audio. Works fine.... Not having CarPlay now does NOT mean CarPlay cannot be added with a new release in the future.
 
During the next 5 months 😀
I suspect early fall like Sept/October when other manufacturers release their next model year designs. Just what I feel I read between the lines
Thanks, I was just curious because I live directly across the street where the new plant is being built in SC. Residents here are very unhappy that our state allowed and recruited Scout to this location. They ate supposed to be about the environment, but yet almost 2000 acres of trees, creeks, wetlands wildlife have been destroyed. Do you get me wrong, I don't blame Scout. I blame our government. We were told in Feb or March of this year that a prototype would soon be coming out. Our air quality here is making a lot of us sick.
 

Attachments

  • 20240625_105243.jpg
    20240625_105243.jpg
    827.5 KB · Views: 12
  • 20240625_105241.jpg
    20240625_105241.jpg
    817.4 KB · Views: 9
  • 20240625_105237.jpg
    20240625_105237.jpg
    786.2 KB · Views: 12
Thanks, I was just curious because I live directly across the street where the new plant is being built in SC. Residents here are very unhappy that our state allowed and recruited Scout to this location. They ate supposed to be about the environment, but yet almost 2000 acres of trees, creeks, wetlands wildlife have been destroyed. Do you get me wrong, I don't blame Scout. I blame our government. We were told in Feb or March of this year that a prototype would soon be coming out. Our air quality here is making a lot of us sick.
Thanks for the updated images on the progress of the site. SM has been pretty clear on their motives to support a green initiative, hint its direction to go EV instead of the mainstreams preferences to go ICE.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J Alynn
Thanks, I was just curious because I live directly across the street where the new plant is being built in SC. Residents here are very unhappy that our state allowed and recruited Scout to this location. They ate supposed to be about the environment, but yet almost 2000 acres of trees, creeks, wetlands wildlife have been destroyed. Do you get me wrong, I don't blame Scout. I blame our government. We were told in Feb or March of this year that a prototype would soon be coming out. Our air quality here is making a lot of us sick.
As someone involved in construction myself there are give and takes especially on a property this large. Codes and mandates require they follow the laws and environmental guidelines. Certainly can’t speak for SM as I’m not an employee but I’m sure they will be planting portions of replacement trees. Knowing there is relatively adjacent highways, railways and vehicle parts suppliers, choosing this location was an environmental positive. They could have gone remote and taken more land for additional highways, infrastructure, etc… which would have consumed more land. I live in corn country in Lancaster Co, PA and we see the same thing. The important this is following responsible growth and development which in the long run is good for the environment. With new development we never like to see it but it was a proper move by SM to be conscious. Imagine it could have been a national builder throwing up cheap apartments which just creates commuter traffic, transient residents with no long term stake in your town and still a loss of trees. SM will make it nice when done as it is their first impression. That said I understand your frustration as a homeowner.
The other advantage is the upcoming boost to your immediate local economy and growth in new businesses, probably less tax increases in the future as they’ll try to get it from SM. The schools will adjust training to help kids land long term careers and visitors to Scout will create tourist opportunities.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, I was just curious because I live directly across the street where the new plant is being built in SC. Residents here are very unhappy that our state allowed and recruited Scout to this location. They ate supposed to be about the environment, but yet almost 2000 acres of trees, creeks, wetlands wildlife have been destroyed. Do you get me wrong, I don't blame Scout. I blame our government. We were told in Feb or March of this year that a prototype would soon be coming out. Our air quality here is making a lot of us sick.
If there were existing wetlands before then there have to be wetlands after. Maybe replaced elsewhere, mitigated, if you will, but nobody, nobody can build even a parking lot without a retention area to go with it. Been that way since last century.

If South Carolina has given Scout Motors a pass on environmental stewardship then SC is in violation of a raft of federal statutes. But won't be the first time SC bucked heads with DC.

Without looking at the land purchase I would also question your 2000 acres. It doesnt even take a fourth of that to build a factory, even one capable of spitting out 150,000 vehicles per year. Toledo Assembly Complex sits on a few hundred acres and includes two actual factories with 84 acres under roof and builds more Jeeps than you can shake a stick at.

Michigan Assembly Plant has 115+ acres of factory floor. Yes you need space outside the buildings but not 2000 acres although that would provide plenty of offroad experiencing.

As far as other South Carolina car plants, BMW Spartanburg, which is largest worldwide BMW factory sits on a mere 1150 acres but spits out 1500 vehicles PER DAY.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J Alynn
As someone involved in construction myself there are give and takes especially on a property this large. Codes and mandates require they follow the laws and environmental guidelines. Certainly can’t speak for SM as I’m not an employee but I’m sure they will be planting portions of replacement trees. Knowing there is relatively adjacent highways, railways and vehicle parts suppliers, choosing this location was an environmental positive. They could have gone remote and taken more land for additional highways, infrastructure, etc… which would have consumed more land. I live in corn country in Lancaster Co, OA and we see the same thing. The important this is following responsible growth and development which in the long run is good for the environment. With new development we never like to see it but it was a proper move by SM to be conscious. Imagine it could have been a national builder throwing up cheap apartments which just creates commuter traffic, transient residents with no long term stake in your town and still a loss of trees. SM will make it nice when done as it is their first impression. That said I understand your frustration as a homeowner.
The other advantage is the upcoming boost to your immediate local economy and growth in new businesses, probably less tax increases in the future as they’ll try to get it from SM. The schools will adjust training to help kids land long term careers and visitors to Scout will create tourist opportunities.
We are located on a major interstate. For SM a new exit is being constructed which meant more land destroyed, peoples property and homes are being affected. We have plenty of tourists already because of where we are located. Straight shot to the coast, to the shipping hubs in Charleston SC, they are putting in a new train rail which will be at the back door of $800k homes. We didn't purchase our retired homes to be in the backyard of an EV plant. How can you consider going green when everything green has been destroyed. Posting a pic just to show how close it is to our homes. Us as life long residents here are really upset. Not all permits were
If there were existing wetlands before then there have to be wetlands after. Maybe replaced elsewhere, mitigated, if you will, but nobody, nobody can build even a parking lot without a retention area to go with it. Been that way since last century.

If South Carolina has given Scout Motors a pass on environmental stewardship then SC is in violation of a raft of federal statutes. But won't be the first time SC bucked heads with DC.

Without looking at the land purchase I would also question your 2000 acres. It doesnt even take a fourth of that to build a factory, even one capable of spitting out 150,000 vehicles per year. Toledo Assembly Complex sits on a few hundred acres and includes two actual factories with 84 acres under roof and builds more Jeeps than you can shake a stick at.

Michigan Assembly Plant has 115+ acres of factory floor. Yes you need space outside the buildings but not 2000 acres although that would provide plenty of offroad experiencing.

As far as other South Carolina car plants, BMW Spartanburg, which is largest worldwide BMW factory sits on a mere 1150 acres but spits out 1500 vehicles PER DAY.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240627_203325_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20240627_203325_Chrome.jpg
    324.6 KB · Views: 9
  • Screenshot_20240627_202954_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20240627_202954_Chrome.jpg
    207 KB · Views: 9
  • Screenshot_20240627_202857_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20240627_202857_Chrome.jpg
    469 KB · Views: 8
  • Like
Reactions: oldgeeksguide
We are located on a major interstate. For SM a new exit is being constructed which meant more land destroyed, peoples property and homes are being affected. We have plenty of tourists already because of where we are located. Straight shot to the coast, to the shipping hubs in Charleston SC, they are putting in a new train rail which will be at the back door of $800k homes. We didn't purchase our retired homes to be in the backyard of an EV plant. How can you consider going green when everything green has been destroyed. Posting a pic just to show how close it is to our homes. Us as life long residents here are really upset. Not all permits were
Sorry you are unhappy. Progress is progress and ultimately progress brings debate. Best I can say. With every project comes pros and cons. I’m not here to argue with you and/or your neighbors. Most of us are here because of Scouts revival. I’ll bow out gracefully from the conversation as there appears to be no chance of you ever being happy. Ultimately I will just block your posts from my side so I can focus on the positives. When I eventually visit SM to hopefully pick up my new Scout I’ll be sure to stay in an adjacent town and eat meals there as well since you feel it’s already touristy enough in your town of Blythewood. Best of luck on finding balance or happiness in your life with this project.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RebelliousPeasant
I, for one, welcome lucylou's feedback on the construction and how the local community is being affected, and have found it interesting and a bit concerning. I wonder what SM's plans are as to mitigating any issues. It's good to have a candid local viewpoint (and photos!) instead of just a one-sided delivery. I wonder if there's a way of routing the railway so that it's not against the back of the houses...

Mmmm...though I wonder if this thread on construction is a better location for it:
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldgeeksguide
Perhaps I was quick to jump on some things on my second post. My wife and I travel a lot for my daughter’s archery career and we pride ourselves on engaging local culture and cuisine rather than chain restaurants so maybe it’s better I offer an olive branch and ask for the two best restaurants in Blythewood?
I did take some time to look at the siteplan drawings and site model per @lucylou comments about the railroad. Looking at the topography, areas of wetlands and the highway exits there is very limited room to go anywhere other than where the rails are indicated. Sure there are open areas on site but per SM’s news the site is designed up front to allow for future expansion and capacity. Ultimately the rail connection has to be reasonable from point A (existing rail) to point B (on site loading/unloading). Also factoring in grading (tracks need to be nearly flat) I’m sure the location was devised based on the best logistics as well as least impact. Trying to wrap railways between highways is a bad choice as an incident at one causes problems for both. Keeping simple traffic patterns keeps employees and workers safer in the long run. Site construction is VERY expensive to begin with. Add all the stormwater control and existing wetlands and the site becomes very limited to work with.
I worked in development for 20+ years for a boss who would praise a 40 acre property covered in trees. Then would design it and eliminate 75% of the trees only to turn around, plant street trees and then talk about being environmental stewards so I get where @lucylou is coming from-that infuriated me. Sometimes we land in circumstances we can’t control but everyone should take the time to learn both sides of the circumstance and see the positive side of things.
We are stronger as people when we overcome the unexpected that is thrown at us. Perhaps this is an opportunity -maybe there are volunteer opportunities that will arise and let you educate visitors, maybe there are trails being provided to provide new walking opportunities. With new projects of this size comes lots of new benefits and in a few years you’ll probably come to realize how many new opportunities you have and be grateful that they all stemmed from SM building a new plant with hundreds of new jobs and new growth in your community. Imagine seeing friends who have current businesses become more successful and be able to offer more to their own families as well as your surrounding communities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldgeeksguide
I wonder what SM's plans are as to mitigating any issues. It's good to have a candid local viewpoint (and photos!) instead of just a one-sided delivery. I wonder if there's a way of routing the railway so that it's not against the back of the houses...
You believe that this hasn’t been covered already by the appropriate people at SM and local, state, and federal governments, and that this forum is the place to fix perceived environmental issues, at this late date? That’s an incredible amount of hubris.