Don’t get me wrong and maybe you used the correct word-‘presented’.I think all environmental elements are important for long term. I’m not going EV for nature though. I’m going for Scout but also ease of use/ maintenance, silence, charge at home and sick 0-60mph times. I think using nature and environment currently doesn’t work for many politicians. Using tech, made in America, staying ahead of our major competitors is something politicians seem to be willing to get behind.
Jump on Scout FB page and every other post is misquoting the gazillion fossil fuels used for EV. If the focus was stay ahead of China, crush buyer interest in BYD, and make desirable vehicle for good ‘ol’ USA the mindset might be easier to change.
Speaking for myself, I never would have considered an ICE Scout. There’s no way I’d pay for ~25 gallons of gas a couple of times a week, I don’t have that kind of disposable income. The only reason this is interesting to me is because it’s electric. EV = doesn’t destroy the planet with emissions and is also a lot cheaper to maintain and operate. Sign me up. Otherwise, hard pass.
Scouts are starting to lose their appeal to me because of the lack of other women (with my demographics) weighing into these conversations. That’s telling me something kind of vital about where I fit into this: I don’t. This is a bro space.
While the commenters on Facebook might be misinformed about fossil fuels and what’s used for what, they’re likely not policy makers. Homer Simpson had a line once where he said he was a white male from the age of 18-49 and everyone listened to him no matter how dumb his suggestions were. They’re who matters.